A year of discoveries – 2012

EdinburghNYE

With the end of the year and the inevitable onslaught of re-edited best of 2012 countdown shows, I decided to join the year’s long nostalgic trip with a look at some of my favourite scientific discoveries of 2012. As the obvious breakthroughs such as the Higgs boson etc will be covered ad lib elsewhere I decided to stick to topics more closely related to my field and in line with the blog. So here’s my short and erratic list, enjoy.

  • As a region that is less explored then the surface of the moon, especially after the success of the ebb and flow gravity mapping satellites, deep sea environments show no slowing down in throwing up new discoveries and 2012 was no different. While James Cameron has stolen all the headlines with his record setting trip to the ocean floor, it’s the discovery of a new hydrothermal vent community in Antarctica that makes my list. The Vent system, an ecosystem supported based on bacteria that chemosynthesis and obtains its energy independently of the sun, was found to include a new species of yeti crab and an assemblage of species markedly different from other vent systems. The discovery of the new systems and its marked difference to other vent systems may help us further understand the biogeography and the dispersion and colonisation of such isolated and extreme environments.
  • Amongst the fantastic successes in space exploration this year included the mapping of the moons surface, the discovery of evidence of water on the asteroid Vesta by Dawn and of course the landing of the mars rover Curiosity. However perhaps one of the most unexpected discoveries of the year came from the most inhospitable of planets Mercury.  Despite being the closest planet to the sun were temperatures can reach a searing 400 degrees Celsius at the surface the Nasa found evidence of water and organic compounds at the bottom of a crater near the poles, which is permanently shaded. While life would not be expected to be found in such an inhospitable location it points to the ubiquitous presence of water ice and organic materials throughout the solar systems, a pre-requisite for life on this planet.
  • With an estimated 86% of the earths species awaiting to be discovered, 2012’s batch didn’t fail to disappoint. Amongst the most notable new species to science include two new species of monkey (Cercopithecus lomamiensis the first to be found in Africa in 28 years and Nycticebus kayan a venomous slow Loris found in Borneo), the smallest know reptile, the largest fossil penguin species and the 126 new species found in Mekong basin just to name a few. Also worth nothing, although not a new species, is the spade toothed beaked whale skeleton, a species yet to be seen in the wild, which no evidence of its existence was known for 30 years.
  • While probably not the most talked about scientific advancement of the year, a paper in Nature by Sugihara et al explaining a method of unravelling causation was one of the most talked about in this department. The statistical procedure called convergent cross mapping can determine cause and effect problem in complex data such as fisheries population dynamics, a problem that so often pains ecologists. While a statistic method doesn’t usually get the excitement levels up but this method will likely provide numerous insights into ecological systems in the future.
  • To counter balance including a statistical paper in my festive highlights of the year I decided to include the several instances of what seems to be reverse Doolittleism, animals trying to speak back to us. While parrots ands primates are usually the mainstay of investigating language, it was a beluga whale and an elephant that caught the ears of scientists this year. Noc, a captive beluga whale in the marine mammal foundation in San Diego was reported to have produced such a convincing human voice that handlers in the water surfaced to say “Who told me to get?”. Furthermore the whale was trained to speak on cue by using much lower sound waves than the normal high click sounds of beluga whales. A second incident of an animal attempting to mimic human language was Koshik, a male elephant in Everland theme park in Yongin, South Korea. Koshik can imitate words such as “annyong” (“hello”), “anja” (“sit down”), “aniya” (“no”) and “choah” (“good”). While other animals have been known to imitate human language, the addition of such large charismatic animals that are both intelligent and also unknown to normally imitate sounds, such as birds do, may be an important input into the evolution of vocal learning.

That’s my list of my favourite discoveries of 2012, which is by no means comprehensive, for example take a look at the wiki page of science in 2012 for a day-by-day list of the best discoveries of the year. Lets hope for the same in 2013.

Author

Kevin Healy: healyke[at]tcd.ie

Photo credit

wikimedia commons

 

 

No animal is an island

800px-Impala_mutualim_with_birds_wide

No man is an island; the same could be said for the millions of life forms that populate our planet. Think of all the ways in which organisms interact with each other through predation, parasitism and the countless symbioses. Sometimes a pair of interacting partners can become inextricably linked such is their mutual dependence. Each one may provide the other with a resource it’s unable to obtain on its own.

A recent collaboration explored instances when these interactions lead to the loss of a trait and showed the fragility of this situation. One of the examples the authors use is an ant species that farms fungus. The fungus provides the ants with all the arginine (an amino acid) they need so they have lost the ability to synthesise it themselves. Thus anytime an ecological interaction involves some provision of a resource by one partner to another the evolutionary pressure is removed and the trait can be lost in the species receiving the goods.  In other words we end up getting ‘compensated trait loss’ due to the ecological interaction. This can tighten a symbiosis from a facultative to an obligatory one.

But the fragility of compensated trait loss should be obvious now. In the ant example, were the fungus to go extinct the ant would disappear along with it. It’s like the ecological interaction is undermining all the good work done by natural selection in providing the ancestral ants with all the traits they need. The authors reckon that trait loss is “grossly underestimated” which puts many species in a precarious position in this age of mass extinction. Although there have been some instances where the trait was recovered, in flagrant disregard for Dollo’s law. Some of these law breakers include parasitic insects who regained their ability to synthesise lipids once the provision was lost.

A difficulty in studying these systems is how to detect when trait loss is taking place. A decreased expression of some gene in some members of a population would probably be reported as natural variation. But with ever improving molecular techniques we will be able to get a better estimate of the number of compensated trait loss interactions.

Author

Adam Kane: kanead[at]tcd.ie

Photo credit

wikimedia commons

Friends with benefits

White-winged Choughs
White-winged Choughs

With the apocalypse come and gone we can still theorise about how our downfall will come about. E. O. Wilson wrote that ‘‘sex is an antisocial force in evolution’’. Charlie Cornwallis, his colleagues at Oxford and their promiscuous birds illustrated why this is so. As is so often the case in evolutionary theory the question centres on sociality, in this instance it takes the form of cooperative breeding. Why would an individual help someone else raise their young rather than having progeny of their own?

The authors ask us to consider the case in birds of a mother and her offspring. If the offspring remains at his natal site and his mother is monogamous he can help in rearing his siblings who are all as related to him as he would be to any of his own potential children. This makes evolutionary sense in terms of relatedness.  However, if his mother is promiscuous his level of relatedness to the resultant other birds will be less than that of his own offspring. The sensible thing for him to do here is to disperse and start a family rather than helping out his half siblings.
The authors of the study collected data on almost 300 bird species recording levels of promiscuity and degree of cooperative breeding to test the monogamy hypothesis. This states that species with high levels of promiscuity will tend towards societies with low levels of cooperative breeding and vice versa.

They were able to show that highly promiscuous birds tend not to have cooperative breeding whereas species like the White-winged Chough, which are completely dependent on others for help in raising their young, are faithful.

But more than this their results demonstrated that, over evolutionary time, transitions to cooperative breeding were associated with low promiscuity. The reverse is also true and echoes Wilson’s statement, because highly promiscuous groups saw a breakdown in cooperation.

There are some exceptions to the rule in that birds can be promiscuous and still have a society of cooperative breeders but this is offset by kin discrimination which involves “directing aid preferentially towards relatives.” So there you have it, sex has the power to destroy societies.

Author

Adam Kane: kanead[at]tcd.ie

Photo credit

wikimedia commons

The 12 days of NERD club

NERD club, for the uninitiated, is a weekly meeting of the Networks in Ecology/Evolution Research Cluster Dynamic of the School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin. We present and discuss our research and also general aspects of academia such as science communication, job hunting and using twitter. The members include interns, PhD students, postdocs and both junior and senior faculty, so it’s always full of interesting research and heated debate! Essentially, it’s my favourite hour of the week, so as it’s the festive season and I’m in a festive mood, I decided to write a Christmas song for NERD club.

It’s to the tune of the 12 Days of Christmas. It’s also not very good, but I had time to fill on the train…

“On the 1st day of Christmas the NERD club gave to me…

parasites in a fractal stomach

On the 2nd day of Christmas the NERD club gave to me…

curious bluetits

and parasites in a fractal stomach

On the 3rd day of Christmas the NERD club gave to me…

debates about twitter

curious bluetits

and parasites in a fractal stomach

 [And so on until]

On the 12th day of Christmas the NERD club gave to me…

a million chocolate fingers

specialist pollinators

ecological stability

mixed effects models

test tubes full of glitter

cryptic flowerpeckers

bats living longer

poisoned honey-bees

news on seminars

debates about twitter

curious bluetits

and parasites in a fractal stomach!”

Merry Christmas everyone! See you in the New Year (provided I survive the hippos – see Keith’s hippo-critical post last week).

Natalie Cooper

@nhcooper123

Image credit: Wikimedia Commons

World’s ending: enough time to read this?

Asteroid_explosion

What will happen today on the last day of the world (21st)? Will some giant asteroid hit the Earth? Will massive tsunamis ravage all the coast lines? Will climate suddenly be way to warm for life? Will methane bubble out of the oceans and asphyxiate everybody? Or are aliens going to take over our planet?

We could spend a long time discussing the causes (or not !) of the end of the world. However people usually ignore the timing of this type of inevitable (or not !!) catastrophe. We all have in mind the asteroid that Alvarez and his fellows discovered – the one that wiped out in a blink of an eye the ferocious Mr. T-Rex. But what people tend to ignore/forget is the timing of such events…

When studying the history of life, the timing and the scale of the timing is always very important! Did the asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs? If we could watch the impact of this asteroid, would we see a herd of Triceratops peacefully grazing on the ground and then, in a blink of an eye… Nothing ?! Same for the even more massive end-Permian event, would we have seen the trilobites bubbling in the sea and then the day after a desolated planet? No.

As this biological crisis appears really swift and savage in the fossil record, it does not mean that they were quick in reality. The fossil record is a random and imperfect record of time. What might look as quick as a blink of an eye could also be something as smooth and long as several million years !

As a French guy, I’m not putting the Catastrophism vs. Uniformitarianism debate back on the table. Obviously these crises were real, loads of species disappeared and in a small amount of time. But a small amount of time relative to  the fossil record, not according to the Mayan calendar !

So I’ll say no worries, if the Mayans were right we still will have time to enjoy Christmas turkey as well as the next couple of million years to go !

 

Author

Thomas Guillerme: thom.g[at]free.fr

Photo credit

wikimedia commons

Smoking nests

769px-Filthy_Habit_by_SillyPuttyEnemies

We all know that cigarettes and smoking are bad for you. However, a recent Biology Letters paper which was featured on BBC Nature suggests that the discarded remains of cigarette butts may help to maintain the health of some urban birds.

Researchers from the National Autonomous University of Mexico found that smoked cigarette butts incorporated into house sparrow and house finch nests may act as parasite repellents. Nests which included high numbers of cigarette butts had fewer parasites. A further experiment involving heat traps to attract parasites indicated that the anti-parasitic properties of the cigarettes seemed to be related to their nicotine content which is only released after the cigarettes have been smoked. This doesn’t necessarily mean that the birds use cigarette butts as an adaptive anti-parasite strategy. Cellulose in the butts is an effective thermal insulator so any anti-parasite effects may be a fortuitous coincidence. The authors suggest that future behavioural choice tests could be used to determine whether birds can distinguish and preferentially include smoked cigarette butts in their constructions.

The paper is an interesting contribution to the growing fields of urban ecological and wildlife research. More than half of the world’s population now lives in urban areas so it is increasingly important to understand the ecological effects of this changing environment. Wildlife and urban areas are not always a happy mix – we have all seen the squished remains of a hedgehog’s attempt to cross a busy road. However, as this paper shows, sometimes urban animals can adopt novel behaviours which appear to have positive consequences.

However, I can’t see the paper being used to counteract anti-cigarette butt litter campaigns any time soon!

 

Author

Sive Finlay: sfinlay[at]tcd.ie

Photo credit

wikimedia commons

Hippo Critical

800px-Hippopotamus_amphibius_Whipsnade_Zoo

Hippopotami have been the talk of the Trinity College Zoology department’s tea room recently. Mainly because a number of staff are about to embark on a field trip to Kenya with some undergraduate students and hippos have featured highly on the list of possible animals which an encounter with might result in death or injury, I therefore decided to investigate, partly to allay fears but mainly to stir them.

In a recent study by Dunham et al. (2010) they investigated human-wildlife conflicts which have resulted in death or injury. The fact that Hippos are one of the most dangerous animals in Africa is common knowledge (in our tea room anyway), but the good news is that crocodiles are far more dangerous. Oh and lions, lions are really dangerous, but mostly crocodiles. In Mozambique crocodiles have killed more people than all other animals combined. More good news for our would-be travellers, only 55% of hippo attacks resulted in death, whereas the figure is close to 80% for crocodiles and alarmingly even higher for elephants. Though chillingly there have been reports of Hippos abandoning herbivory for a more carnivorous lifestyle.

Overall it is good news, hippos are not in fact that dangerous as long as you can manage to keep away from the water. So our intrepid explorers can relax in their campsite in their tents on the shores of lake Naivasha just remember hippos come onto land at night to feed, so perhaps pitch your tent away from the juicy grass.

 

Author

Keith McMahon: mcmahok[at]tcd.ie

Photo credit

Wikimedia commons

Gorillas and/or potatoes?

Capture d’écran 2012-12-14 à 14.07.18

If you were given a resource that could guarantee revenue of $30 million every year, with almost triple that amount additionally coming through ancillary spending, would you ignore it? If this resource then had the power to lift some of the most marginalised people on the planet out of poverty, you would even think twice? Gorilla tourism in Rwanda is this valuable and the people living around Volcanoes National Park (one of the few remaining islands for this species) are some of the poorest in Africa. My research into interactions between the national park and local farmers has revealed that control of land is one of the key factors in creating conflict between the ideals of national park management and those of subsistence farmers. When people have little control over what they grow in this highly fertile region, either through government land use consolidation initiatives or private agro-industry, the impact of buffalos raiding potato fields or gorillas decimating eucalyptus plantations is exacerbated. The catch is, cultural values and hierarchies in Rwanda mean that leadership will be followed, as changes are effected unquestioningly. One solution is to increase the proportion of tourism revenue shared with local communities, instilling a feeling of ownership, and responsibility for, their forest. But this can only come with livelihood autonomy.

 

Author

Shane McGuinness: mcguinsk[at]tcd.ie

Photo credit

Shane McGuinness

A Christmas Story…

As the festive season draws upon us, Pope Benedict XVI is attracting increasing attention in the international press. Today (12th December) is scheduled to see the first tweet issued by the pontiff, a message which is predicted to reach at least 1 million followers; a remarkable number which fades in comparison to the 32 million people following Lady Gaga – what does that say about modern society?

Aside from his increasing social media presence, Pope Benedict has also been at the centre of a media storm which accused him of “banning Christmas”. The article was in response to the pontiff’s latest book, “The Infancy Narratives-Jesus of Nazareth” in which he re-evaluates evidence for aspects of the Christmas story. He commented that there was no historical record of angels singing carols and also no account of animals being present in the manger, statements which were easy fodder for attention-grabbing headlines. However, these sensationalist accounts were gross misrepresentations of what the Pope actually said and prompted a Christian news blog to release a re-assuring statement that the pontiff did not ban Christmas!

Aside from the worrying evidence of just how easily “news” can be fabricated and misconstrued, what attracted me to this story was the importance of animals in the Christmas tradition. The idea that seemed to upset people the most was the suggestion that a donkey and an ox might be removed from nativity scenes for ever more (which would undoubtedly alleviate some of the stresses associated with home-made nativity costumes!). This outcry is a reminder of our need to feel connected with animals and the natural world in general; E.O Wilson’s concept of biophilia. The presence of animals in the manger seems to be associated with some of the comforting qualities which contribute to the ever-expanding success of animal assisted therapies. Positive effects of human-animal interactions permeate all aspects of our society, from religious traditions to promoting a general sense of health and well-being in our daily lives. Some evidence even suggests that pet ownership may be correlated with longer life spans!

Rest-assured, therefore, the Pope did not in fact “ban Christmas” and both a donkey and an ox feature in the nativity scene in St. Peter’s Square.  I guess this means that there will be more proud parents of “donkey number 1” swelling the audience ranks of nativity plays for many years to come!

 

Author

Sive Finlay: sfinlay[at]tcd.ie

Photo credit

Wikimedia commons

Sex on the beach?

Mr Garrison taught  South Park Elementary children (season 10, episode 12) the good old fashion way of seeing evolution; “we are the retarded children of some retarded frog-fish-squirrel…”. This is the gradualist way of seeing evolutionary processes; leading from uninteresting jelly fishes to the mighty Arnold Shwarzenegger.

Many scientists reject this gradualist view in favour of Darwin’s idea that “there is no innate tendency leading to progress in evolution”. But do they really gave up this idea? A few gradualistic events in the history of life remains firmly accepted such as how the vertebrates went out of the water. . This theory refers to  fossil evidence from the Late Devonian period (that’s about 350 million years ago), suggesting that early tetrapods used their legs to go out of the water and conquer the brave new terrestrial world.

However, during this last decade, many paleontologists (yes, they don’t just look  for dinos) pointed out some disturbing facts: the early tetrapods, such as the iconic Ichthyostega, were in fact not able to walk out of the water at all ! So why the hell did they develop legs?

This question is an example of my favourite part of macroevolution: exaptations (when the function of a trait shifts during evolution). The French palaeontologist, S. Steyer, pointed out that early legs may have been used in many way before being useful to Usain Bolt: for swimming, for hunting (used to hold onto the seabed) or even… for sex ! S. Steyer suggested that legs could have been used to grab the female during sexy time as frogs  do today.

Other interesting aspects of this  gradual transition from water to land are the timing and the possible reasons why  early tetrapods left the water to go conquer the new terrestrial world – which was not new at all by the way; arthropods had ventured out of the water since the early Devonian. Recent tracks discovered in Poland suggest that a 50cm long “retarded fish-frog” walked on the beach in the Early-Middle Devonian, that’s 20 million years before Mr. Ichthyostega was groping his lovely wife. Niedzwiedzki and his team interpreted these tracks (and some other “younger” ones like the Irish Valentia Island trackway) as belonging to some tetrapods that eventually went out of the sea to scavenge  on the beach on low tide.

So was there really a graduale evolution from water to land in vertebrates? Who really made these tracks if it wasn’t Ichthyostega who  actually just “walked ” like a walrus?  Even though legs probably didn’t evolve for walking, some tetrapods may have thought that it would be fun to go on the beach for a walk and get yummy carcasses. Were their other tetrapod colleagues  using their legs for less adventurous but still cool purposes such as the possibilities listed above? As an answer to these questions, let’s just say that it’s complicated and it takes more than one big step on the shore to go from the “retarded fish-frogs”…

 

Author

Thomas Guillerme: thom.g[at]free.fr

Photo credit

South Park – season 10, episode 12